“At minimal” regulation enforcement and policymakers on the federal, state and native ranges ought to classify neck restraints as a use of “lethal drive,” the group stated.
The nationwide dialog about banning chokeholds intensified with the loss of life of Floyd in Might 2020 when a Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for greater than 9 minutes. Advocates additionally pointed to Garner’s loss of life in 2014, when NY city officers subdued him with a chokehold whereas he advised them he could not breathe.
Lawmakers in Congress who’re engaged on a policing reform invoice have mentioned a nationwide ban on using chokeholds by regulation enforcement.
Chokeholds and strangleholds limit a person’s capacity to breathe or have blood circulate correctly to the pinnacle as a way to incapacitate them. However an officer’s transfer within the second to restrain somebody carries vital danger, significantly for these with underlying cardiovascular danger elements, which might be extra widespread in communities of coloration, in accordance with the AAN.
“Limiting cerebral blood circulate or oxygen supply, even briefly, may cause everlasting harm to the mind, together with stroke, cognitive impairment, and even loss of life,” the assertion stated.
The long run neurological results of neck restraints are “probably irreversible and fully preventable,” the group stated.
“As a result of there is no such thing as a quantity of coaching or technique of utility of neck restraints that may mitigate the chance of loss of life or everlasting profound neurologic harm with this maneuver, the AAN recommends prohibiting using neck restraints,” the assertion learn.